Declare a local variable, its quicker and more readable than accessing an array
If you’re currently doing something like this in a for loop:
var i = 0,
anArray = [ ... ];
for ( i = 0; i < anArray.length; i++ ) {
perform access with anArray[ i ] multiple times
}
Remember that it’s a little quicker to use a local variable (and it’s more readable if the contents of your for loop spans more than a couple of lines/operations):
var i = 0,
item = null,
anArray = [ ... ];
for ( i = 0; i < anArray.length; i++ ) {
item = anArray[ i ]
perform access with item multiple times
}
As it turns out, Nikolas Zakas also agrees which is no bad thing.
It’s probably worth noting that it’s usually preferable to optimise at the end of completing a feature/fix but in this case I feel it’s more readable so usually adopt this as a best practise right off the bat.
You can usually make this sort of thing even quicker by ditching the for loop in favour of a while loop (http://jsperf.com/fors-vs-while/58), incidentally it looks like Mozilla still reigns supreme for this sort of thing too!
Written by Matt Styles
Related protips
1 Response
Or, the ES5 way :)
userList.forEach(function(user) {
console.log(user.name);
});Have a fresh tip? Share with Coderwall community!
JavaScript on a page runs with the privileges of that origin. One altered library, tag manager, or snippet can read inputs, change what people see, and call your APIs as the user.
Security insights from Cside